From JavaScript Fatigue to AI Fatigue

In our previous articles, we explored how the JavaScript ecosystem consolidated around tooling, frameworks, and testing tools, moving from fragmentation toward unified solutions. This consolidation period addressed many of the pain points that created the original “JavaScript Fatigue” crisis of 2016.

The toolchain was stabilizing. Unified solutions like Create React App were abstracting away complex configuration. Prettier was ending debates about code formatting. TypeScript was becoming the default. The ecosystem had learned its lessons from the chaos and was building invisible, integrated toolchains.

But just as developers were beginning to breathe easier, another transformation was beginning: AI assistance that would fundamentally change not just how we code, but what it means to be a developer. If the 2010s were about surviving tool complexity, the 2020s would be about adapting to a world where that complexity could be managed by an intelligent partner.

If you’ve been doing frontend work for more than five years, you probably remember 2016. Not fondly, but you remember it.

That was the year we hit peak absurdity. You’d start a new project, confident you were just going to build something, and suddenly you’re deep in webpack config hell, trying to make Babel talk to your bundler while your linter argues with Prettier about semicolons. Twelve configuration files. Fifty dependencies just to say “hello world” to the browser. And every six months, something would break catastrophically because someone released a breaking change in a library you forgot you even installed.

The term “JavaScript Fatigue” wasn’t hyperbole. It was a genuine crisis. Talented developers were burning out and leaving the field entirely. Senior developers—people with years of expertise—felt like their knowledge was becoming worthless overnight. The cognitive load was so crushing that some of the best people in the ecosystem just gave up and switched to backend.

The Thing Nobody Tells You About Chaos

Here’s what’s weird in retrospect: all that chaos was actually necessary.

The ecosystem had to explode. We needed the Module Wars (ES Modules vs. CommonJS). We needed to try a thousand different approaches to bundling. We needed webpack to teach us what not to do. Because somewhere in that mess, developers started asking a radical question: “What if we just made this… simpler?”

Around 2017, something shifted. Prettier came out and immediately ended years of pointless debates by just making a choice and enforcing it. Create React App and Parcel arrived and proved that abstraction wasn’t the enemy—hidden complexity was. Tools started getting stable. TypeScript stopped being a weird add-on and became the default. The community collectively said: convention over configuration, stability over innovation, and we actually meant it this time.

The Moment Everything Changed

Then 2020 happened, and the tooling world got religion. Developers realized that slow tools cost real money, and they started writing new tools in Rust, Go, and Zig instead of JavaScript.

Vite arrived and fundamentally broke the rules. It said “why are we bundling during development?” and used native ES Modules instead. Cold starts went from minutes to seconds. Hot module replacement became instant. You could actually see your changes without waiting.

Then Biome showed up and consolidated linting and formatting into a single tool that’s 10-100x faster than the old ESLint + Prettier combo. Next.js swapped Babel for the Rust-based SWC. Bun arrived as an all-in-one runtime, bundler, and package manager that installs dependencies 4-8 times faster than npm. Each one was faster, cleaner, more purposeful.

And something quietly miraculous happened: the toolchain started to disappear.

The Invisible Toolchain

In 2016, your toolchain was constantly demanding attention. It was the main character in your development story. You spent days fighting configuration. You spent weeks managing upgrades. The tools weren’t serving you—you were serving them.

In 2025, a developer can go from idea to coding in 3-5 minutes using Vite or Next.js or Bun. No Stack Overflow tabs needed. No twelve configuration files. The setup is so fast and so obvious that you almost don’t notice it happened. The toolchain has done its job so well that it’s faded into the background, where it belongs.

This is what excellence looks like in tooling: when it stops being something you think about and becomes something that just works.

The Wild Card: AI Just Changed Everything Again

There’s one more layer to this story that wasn’t in the original chaos. AI-assisted development has become part of the modern stack, and it’s doing something interesting: it’s filling expertise gaps in seconds.

Configuration that would have taken hours now takes minutes because an AI can install dependencies, generate config files, and explain complex setups instantly. Debugging cryptic module conflicts, generating migration checklists from webpack to Vite, suggesting code fixes for breaking changes—these are all problems that used to consume your day and now just… get solved.

The cognitive load that was crushing developers ten years ago is being outsourced to an intelligent partner.

What’s Next? The Familiar Stranger

Here’s the thing that keeps me up at night: the toolchain got so good, and AI assistance got so capable, that we’re entering territory that feels uncomfortably familiar.

In 2016, senior developers faced an identity crisis because the underlying stack kept shifting. TypeScript today, something else tomorrow. Your expertise was a moving target. But at least you could learn the next thing. You could read the docs, build a project, retrain yourself.

In 2025, it’s different. It’s worse in a weird way.

AI has been trained on all of that know-how. The entire corpus of technical knowledge—design patterns, debugging strategies, architectural decisions, best practices—all of it is accessible to anyone typing a prompt. A junior developer with ChatGPT can produce code that would have taken you three days to write ten years ago. They don’t need to know why it works. They just need to know that it does.

So what’s a senior developer for now?

You become an architect. A reviewer. A mentor who defines what to build and oversees the implementation. You make strategic decisions while AI handles the actual coding. You’re no longer solving problems through craftsmanship—you’re overseeing a process where the craftsmanship happens automatically.

The theory is clean: you’re freed from implementation details so you can focus on the bigger picture. In practice, it feels like something was taken from you that you didn’t realize you needed.

Some developers are adapting, leaning into prompt engineering or systems design. Others are quietly panicking. Because here’s the dark part: the joy that used to come from solving a hard problem yourself, from the satisfaction of shipping code you built with your own hands—that’s gone. What replaces it is high-level decision-making and code review. Constant, exhausting high-level decision-making.

And that’s where “AI Fatigue” lives. It’s not the chaos fatigue of 2016, which was about complexity and too many choices screaming for your attention. This is psychological. It’s the creeping dread that your expertise—the hard-won knowledge forged through thousands of hours—is no longer the bottleneck. AI can match or exceed what you’d write, often faster. Your value proposition just shifted from “I can build this well” to “I can decide whether this should be built.”

That’s a different kind of exhaustion entirely. It’s the fatigue of relevance. Of constantly re-learning what your job even is while the things that made you good at it become optional.

We survived tool chaos. We built invisible toolchains. Now we’re facing something we haven’t had to adapt to before: a transition where the skills we spent decades perfecting are becoming implementation details in someone else’s process.

The industry is figuring this out. Some senior developers are embracing the pivot — leaning into systems design, AI model training, architectural vision. Others are stuck between worlds, skilled in implementation but watching implementation become commodity work. The consensus emerging is that humans and AI will work together, each playing to their strengths. That’s probably true. But right now, in 2025, we’re in the painful part of the transition.

The need for skilled engineers remains. The work isn’t going away. But the relationship between seniority, expertise, and value is fundamentally broken. We’re learning that being good at something doesn’t guarantee you’ll be good at not doing it.

What we’re really grappling with is a shift in the fundamental nature of software development itself. As we’ll explore in the next article, this shift represents not just a new kind of fatigue, but the beginning of the next major transformation in how we build software — one that will push expertise and even business logic into commoditized packages.

---

← Previous article: The Maturation Phase | Next article: Conclusion and Speculation →